Native wrote:I can't even change a lightbulb... lol.
I spent half the night looking at carburetor options, and did order a carb and manifold from England. But, ended up with exactly the same carb (maybe slightly older version, maybe without the auto choke) as what's on the car.
I find talk about carbs to be a lot like talk about suspension on a Miata. You have an old car, parts are worn out. You put on a cheap coilover kit, and it's better... but, not "best". You could spend a LOT more money and time on perfection, but unless you're racing... why? Or... you could just put fresh stock components back on the car and make it like it was when it was new, and be happy!
Ditto carbs. The "cheap coilover kit" option would be the Weber downdraft carb kit. Easy to install, works fairly well and probably better performance than a 40-year-old carb that needs to be rebuilt. But, it's not "all of it", and it does have its quirks. The "ultimate" is the OE dual carb setup that was used on these engines in Europe, but not here. That option is getting pricey due to availability of parts, and I really don't want to futz with dual carbs.
The easy button: just rebuild the existing carb! It may have already been rebuilt, and just needs to be adjusted.
The other option that I was seriously considering was the larger version of the same carb. This one is a "CD150", 1.5" bore. A "CD175" 1.75" bore is also available, and could be made to fit the stock manifold with minimal modification. And, or course, these carbs are "Zenith-Stromberg" brand carbs... the old timers are huge fans of the SU carbs, which are almost exactly the same, just some minor differences. I could get the SU equivalent 1.5 or 1.75" carb... or the metric equivalent!
But, then I got to the science of the matter. Bigger is not always better. This engine, at 6000 rpm (and you really don't want to rev this long-stroke beast beyond that a whole lot, piston speeds get insanely high, not good for the bottom end at all!) should flow 135 cfm. Even slightly warmed over (ported, cammed, etc), it's still only going to flow 150 cfm. The 1.5" carbs should flow about 137 cfm max, which means the engine would run out of steam at 6k... but, I kind of WANT it to do that to not encourage over-revving! The 1.75's are good for around 210 cfm, which would be overkill and probably not idle as well.
So, I'm leaning towards just rebuilding that carb that I'm getting from UK. Get it in good working order, and with an old school manual choke.
Oh, the manifold? And why did I order it?
The stock single-carb Spitfire/Midget 1500 manifold is a "log" manifold. Carb goes into a log, and 4 ports go out to the engine. 90-degree angles for airflow EVERYWHERE, and it is known that the two center cylinders tend to run richer. It's not ideal, but it works.
I found reference to, and then FOUND ONE on eBay, a manifold that was used on the Triumph Herald 13/60... same engine, same carb, different manifold. This manifold has nice curved runners that split neatly to the intake ports on the head. That should put more of that carb cfm actually INTO the engine! It's known to fit the engine, AND fit in the car, should be a good simple improvement.
I also looked into the strange "chipping" that appeared to exist inside one of my cylinders. That just led to confusion. I'm going to need to look in there again and really wrap my head around what I'm seeing. I may want to pull the head, give it a look, and replace the head gasket. But, that's not as hard as it sounds. Because the cam is in the block... there's not much involved in removing the head!