Discuss helmet rule

For any discussion about the club as an organization
Steve --
Forum Admin
Drives: whatever I can get my hands on
User avatar
Location:
St. Pete
Joined: November 2006
Posts: 5122
First Name: Steve
Last Name: --
Favorite Car: whatever I can get my hands on
Location: St. Pete

Discuss helmet rule

Postby Native » Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:22 pm

In some other thread, I suggested that our helmet rule was any helmet as long as DOT approved, to satisfy our insurance requirements.

After receiving some feedback, I'd like to revisit the issue, and get a more broad concensus.

How do we want to rule on helmets? DOT only? Snell M or SA - no more than 2 revisions ('95 right now)? half-lid or full coverage (open-faced allowed)? other?

We MUST adopt DOT-approved only - for insurance. Are we going to make other rules?

I'd like to hear what ya'll think, please.
Steven Frank
Class M3 Miata
Proud disciple of the "Push Harder, Suck Less" School of Autocross
______________
I'll get to it. Eventually...
Dave --
Notorious
Drives: Isuzu Pick-Up
User avatar
Joined: January 2007
Posts: 848
First Name: Dave
Last Name: --
Favorite Car: Isuzu Pick-Up

Postby Dave-ROR » Sun Jan 14, 2007 2:06 pm

At this point, a lot of HPDE's are requiring Snell M/SA 2000 or 2005. 95's aren't valid at a number of track days at this point.

My opinion is SA or M snell rated 95+ at a minimum, preferably 2000 or 2005 SA/M snell rated.

Open face or closed is a preference and for autocrossing open face probably isn't a huge concern. On the track, I'd go closed face for protection from flying debris, but we don't have much of that at SPC or brooksville do we?
-Dave
I drive really slow cars... really slowly.
Charles --
Notorious
Drives: Nissan 240SX
Joined: December 2006
Posts: 722
First Name: Charles
Last Name: --
Favorite Car: Nissan 240SX

Postby Charles » Sun Jan 14, 2007 3:12 pm

For the type of events we run I'd say whatever the insurance requires of us is fine.
Loren Williams
Forum Admin
Drives: A Mirage
User avatar
Location:
Safety Harbor
Joined: December 2006
Posts: 13044
First Name: Loren
Last Name: Williams
Favorite Car: A Mirage
Location: Safety Harbor

Postby Loren » Sun Jan 14, 2007 3:41 pm

I agree. Being as flexible as our insurance allows us to be on helmet requirements allows us to be much more welcoming of newcomers. Yeah, we have loaner helmets... but a lot of people have cycle helmets around that may or may not be Snell certified. Let 'em run with those and they're happy.

Yeah, they'll have to get a better helmet to run with any other autox club. Yeah, they'll need a better helmet to do HPDE or club racing. But that's no reason to not allow a DOT helmet at our events.
Loren Williams - Loren @ Invisiblesun.org
The "Push Harder, Suck Less" philosophy explained:
Push Harder - Drive as close to the limit of your tires as possible.
Suck Less - Drive something resembling a proper racing line.
---------- ----------
Notorious
Drives: Whatever has more miles than anything on the grid
User avatar
Location:
Just within reach of storm surge
Joined: December 2006
Posts: 2308
First Name: ----------
Last Name: ----------
Favorite Car: Whatever has more miles than anything on the grid
Location: Just within reach of storm surge

Postby Jamie » Sun Jan 14, 2007 5:51 pm

What started the discussion was whether to allow motorcycle helmets skimpier than the regular open-face helmet -- skid lids and such. Some of those are DOT-approved...IMO, they're not suitable for autocross, where there are pieces of car in close proximity to the sides of the driver's head.
Jamie
'01 Miata, '92 Prelude Si, '88 Alpina B10/3.5, '63 Suburban
Speed Demon Racing
Loren Williams
Forum Admin
Drives: A Mirage
User avatar
Location:
Safety Harbor
Joined: December 2006
Posts: 13044
First Name: Loren
Last Name: Williams
Favorite Car: A Mirage
Location: Safety Harbor

Postby Loren » Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:00 pm

IMO, if the insurance didn't require it, there's no real "need" for a helmet in autocross. If anyone truly believes that there is... why don't you wear one on the street? There are far more obstacles, stupid people and dangerous situations to be found on the street... and it's the same car with the same things to hit your head on.

As I mentioned to Steve last week, I think the helmet thing is more psychological than anything else. It's a way to help you differentiate between "race mode" and "street mode" driving.
Loren Williams - Loren @ Invisiblesun.org
The "Push Harder, Suck Less" philosophy explained:
Push Harder - Drive as close to the limit of your tires as possible.
Suck Less - Drive something resembling a proper racing line.
Charles --
Notorious
Drives: Nissan 240SX
Joined: December 2006
Posts: 722
First Name: Charles
Last Name: --
Favorite Car: Nissan 240SX

Postby Charles » Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:03 pm

Jamie wrote:What started the discussion was whether to allow motorcycle helmets skimpier than the regular open-face helmet -- skid lids and such.
I call em' brain buckets and those won't fly, I don't think they are even DOT approved since they really don't protect you from anything.

Either way I'd say we should go with any open-faced OR closed-face that's DOT approved is fine.
Jeff --
Well-Known
Drives: Subaru
User avatar
Location:
St. Petersburg, FL
Joined: November 2006
Posts: 420
First Name: Jeff
Last Name: --
Favorite Car: Subaru
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Postby kickslop » Sun Jan 14, 2007 9:57 pm

Loren wrote:IMO, if the insurance didn't require it, there's no real "need" for a helmet in autocross.
Agreeeeeeed.
---------- ----------
Notorious
Drives: Whatever has more miles than anything on the grid
User avatar
Location:
Just within reach of storm surge
Joined: December 2006
Posts: 2308
First Name: ----------
Last Name: ----------
Favorite Car: Whatever has more miles than anything on the grid
Location: Just within reach of storm surge

Postby Jamie » Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:15 pm

Charles wrote:I call em' brain buckets and those won't fly, I don't think they are even DOT approved....
I thought not, too, which would have settled the issue -- then I found several places advertising DOT-approved skid lids.
Loren wrote:IMO, if the insurance didn't require it, there's no real "need" for a helmet in autocross.
Not true. I've seen about a half-dozen incidents where the driver's head came in violent contact with the car. At least two of those were side impacts. I imagine there are more out there I don't know about.

There are days when I am tempted to wear a helmet in traffic....
Jamie
'01 Miata, '92 Prelude Si, '88 Alpina B10/3.5, '63 Suburban
Speed Demon Racing
Kenny --
Notorious
Drives: Subaru
Location:
Largo, FL
Joined: December 2006
Posts: 545
First Name: Kenny
Last Name: --
Favorite Car: Subaru
Location: Largo, FL

Postby Alizarin » Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:50 pm

Jamie wrote:There are days when I am tempted to wear a helmet in traffic....
Especially after seeing that wreck near SPC on Saturday...
Kenny Gardner
2004 "Triple Nickel" WRX
Steve --
Forum Admin
Drives: whatever I can get my hands on
User avatar
Location:
St. Pete
Joined: November 2006
Posts: 5122
First Name: Steve
Last Name: --
Favorite Car: whatever I can get my hands on
Location: St. Pete

Postby Native » Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:11 pm

Any one else have anything to add?
Steven Frank
Class M3 Miata
Proud disciple of the "Push Harder, Suck Less" School of Autocross
______________
I'll get to it. Eventually...
Rob --
Notorious
Drives: Mustang
User avatar
Location:
St. Pete Fla
Joined: December 2006
Posts: 816
First Name: Rob
Last Name: --
Favorite Car: Mustang
Location: St. Pete Fla

Postby blacksheep-1 » Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:58 pm

Yeah, DOT full or open face only, no "lids" that satisfies the insurance I believe, other than that I'd say any Snell (motorcycle or racecar) approved should be fine. The reason I say that is IMO an 85 Snell should still be better than a 2007 DOT.
I would also agree that the main issue in an autocross car is your head coming in contact with an interior car part, or the co-driver's noggin.

Return to “FAST Related”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 1 guest